Glad to have you back today!
Quite often, we hear people say that the Rent is too high (we even heard a potential political candidate run on that platform a while back!). Well, yes, Rent can be quite high, but as everything else in life, it's all relative.
Venessa Wong for Bloomberg Businessweek ran an article titled, "The 10 Worst Cities for Renters", which ran in the Yahoo Real Estate Section, which took a look at how "much" is rent, relatively speaking. In the article, Wong states that over the past few decades, "...rent levels grew faster than renter income.", and that the amount of income, "apportioned to rent" has grown dramatically over the past fifty years. Wong cites research by Harvard University's Joint Center for Housing Studies, which shows that, "In 1960, about one-quarter of renters in the U.S. were at least moderately burdened, including 12 percent with a severe burden", and by 2009. the rate doubled to nearly half of renters with at least a moderate burden, including 26 percent with a severe burden.".What this means, as stated in the article, is that nearly half of renters pay more than 30 percent of their monthly income for rent, including 26 percent that pay more than 50 percent of income.
Taking this data into account, which are the worst cities for Renters? Wong states that it’s not necessarily the most expensive cities that are to blame (and as you will see, not the biggest cities, either).
Here is the list of the top 10 metropolitan areas ("toughest U.S. cities for renters"), ranked by the percentage of tenants spending more than half of their income on rent, per the article:
No. 10 Metro: Bridgeport, Conn. - Renter households with severe cost burdens: 30.5%
No. 9 Metro: Toledo, Ohio - Renter households with severe cost burdens: 30.8%
No. 8 Metro: Orlando - Renter households with severe cost burdens: 30.9%
No. 7 Metro: Memphis - Renter households with severe cost burdens: 31.6%
No. 6 Metro: Akron, Ohio - Renter households with severe cost burdens: 31.8%
No. 5 Metro: New Orleans - Renter households with severe cost burdens: 31.8%
No. 4 Metro: New Haven - Renter households with severe cost burdens: 32.7%
No. 3 Metro: Detroit - Renter households with severe cost burdens: 32.8%
No. 2 Metro: McAllen, Tex. - Renter households with severe cost burdens: 33.1%
No. 1 Metro: Miami - Renter households with severe cost burdens: 34.2%
A quick glance at this list might make you wonder: What about New York City? Los Angeles? Chicago? This might change your perception; as the title suggests, "Big City, Big Rent? Think Again". The forecast in the article mentions that, "increases in rent levels are expected to continue outpacing income growth. Demand for rentals also may continue to grow as the preference for homeownership changes."
What are your thoughts? Have you calculated rent as a percent of monthly income in your area? What was the percentage and what area did you calculate it for?
Have a Great Week, and Happy Rent-to-Owning !
Regards,
Rob Eisenstein
HomeRun Homes Blog http://blogging.lease2buy.com
HomeRun Homes Website http://www.lease2buy.com
TAGS: #rent #realestate #miami #renter